To get the lastest report, please subscribe to our newsletter or contact us at [email protected]
On 30 June 2026, Circle Internet Financial (NYSE: CRCL) experienced a 17% single-day decline in share price following the announcement by the Open Standard (OS) Alliance — comprising over 140 institutional members including Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, Stripe, Coinbase, and Google — of its intention to launch Open USD (OUSD).
This research base examines the fundamental dynamics of the stablecoin market, the strategic positioning of USDC and USDT, the implications of the OUSD announcement, and the long-term trajectory toward native digital dollars as programmable money infrastructure.
Key conclusions: (1) Stablecoins evolved from a temporary compromise into genuinely superior payment infrastructure; (2) USDC’s compliance moat is shallower than perceived — network effects can be challenged by institutional coalitions; (3) In the medium term, USDT’s retreat from regulated markets creates a substantial windfall for USDC; (4) Long-term, native chain-issued dollars (tokenised deposits + CBDC) will render traditional stablecoins obsolete.
1. The Origins: A Compromise Solution
The stablecoin was born as an innovative compromise. In the early years of cryptocurrency trading, banks refused to serve Bitcoin exchanges. When traders sold Bitcoin on an exchange, there are no straightforward mechanism to withdraw fund to a traditional bank account.
The solution was simple: exchanges issued dollar-pegged tokens internally. Traders could “lock in” USD value within the cryptocurrency ecosystem without needing to interface with the hostile traditional banking system. Tether (USDT), launched in 2014 by the Hong Kong-based exchange Bitfinex, was the pioneer of this model.
The irony is palpable: today, licensed cryptocurrency exchanges in jurisdictions like Hong Kong can directly connect to bank accounts. One can purchase Bitcoin through regulated financial institutions. The original reason for stablecoins no longer exists — yet stablecoins have never been more important than before.
The reason is that stablecoins evolved from a compromise into a genuinely better solution. Traditional cross-border transfers require 1-5 business days, cost $15-50 per transaction, operate only during business hours, and provide near-zero transparency. Stablecoins settle in seconds, operate 24/7/365, cost a fraction of wire fees, and offer full on-chain traceability.
2. USDT: The Grey Market's Lifeblood
Launched in 2014, Tether (USDT) solved a genuine problem: enabling cryptocurrency traders to lock in USD value without bank access. Over the subsequent decade, USDT became the de facto dollar of the crypto world. Nearly every exchange denominates trading pairs in USDT. With a market capitalisation of approximately $187.9 billion, USDT commands nearly 60% of the stablecoin market.
However, USDT’s reserve transparency has faced persistent scrutiny. Allegations of Bitcoin price manipulation through unbacked USDT issuance have circulated for years. Its lax regulatory posture, combined with borderless accessibility, made it the instrument of choice for telecommunications fraud and illegal gambling operations. During the COVID-19 pandemic, USDT rapidly replaced physical cash in grey-market transactions.
Today, USDT functions as the lifeblood of the grey economy — an open secret within the industry. As global regulatory frameworks tighten, particularly the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), USDT faces systematic exclusion from regulated markets. Beginning 1 July 2026, European compliant exchanges delisted USDT entirely.
3. USDC: The Compliance-First Model
Launched in 2018 as a joint venture between Circle and Coinbase, USDC pursued a fundamentally different strategy: compliance as competitive advantage. Over seven years, Circle secured regulatory licences across multiple jurisdictions and became the first stablecoin issuer to achieve full MiCA compliance in the European Union. USDC reserves undergo monthly attestation by Deloitte, one of the Big Four accounting firms.
USDC positioned itself as the bridge between decentralised finance (DeFi) and traditional financial networks. Circle’s strategic thesis was elegant: through sustained investment in compliance infrastructure and accumulated network effects, incentivise traditional financial institutions to adopt USDC as the “only legitimate entry point” into the stablecoin ecosystem.
Circle’s Revenue Architecture
Circle’s financial model is straightforward and extraordinarily profitable. Users deposit $1; Circle issues 1 USDC token; Circle deploys the deposited funds into US Treasury bills and cash equivalents; Circle captures the interest yield. According to Circle’s 2025 annual report, the company generated $27.47 billion in total revenue, of which $26.37 billion — approximately 96% — derived from reserve interest income.
4. The Open Standard Alliance and OUSD
On 30 June 2026, the Open Standard (OS) Alliance announced the launch of Open USD (OUSD). The consortium comprises over 140 institutional members spanning payments (Visa, Mastercard, Stripe), asset management (BlackRock), technology (Google, Shopify), cryptocurrency (Coinbase), and banking (Standard Chartered, BNY, DBS, OCBC, ANZ, UOB).
The market’s sharp negative reaction to Circle’s stock reflects a critical insight: the threat to USDC is not that OUSD is technologically superior, but that OUSD demonstrates Circle’s compliance moat is not impregnable. Notably, Coinbase — USDC’s co-founder and largest distributor — appears on the OS Alliance member list.
The Real Threat to USDC
OUSD’s value proposition centres on three commitments: reserve yield distributed to all members, zero minting and redemption fees, and collective ownership, governance, and revenue sharing. The “strategic partnership” roster and “community” revenue-sharing language carry distinctly familiar marketing cadences from cryptocurrency culture.
However, the OS Alliance faces substantial structural challenges. One hundred forty institutions from disparate industries, varying scales, and divergent regulatory conditions do not naturally share common interests. Unless a SWIFT-calibre or central bank-level participant enters, OUSD is unlikely to achieve payment infrastructure status — particularly given SWIFT’s own announced blockchain-based tokenised deposit initiative for 24/7 cross-border transfers.
The material threat is perception. OUSD’s announcement constitutes a “user revolt” against Circle’s interest-capture model. If institutional partners demand equitable distribution of reserve yields — and potentially establish alternative infrastructure — Circle’s network effect advantage erodes materially.
5. The Stablecoin Business Model
Traditional stablecoin economics (USDT, USDC) follow an identical template: deposit $1, receive 1 token, the issuer purchases US Treasuries with your money, the issuer keeps the yield. According to CryptoNews reporting, Tether generated $10 billion in 2025 through this mechanism. Circle’s $26.37 billion in reserve income operates on the same principle.
In this model, stablecoins function as profit centres for issuers. Since institutional adoption represents Circle’s most valuable asset, partners’ demands for yield participation are entirely rational — and their eventual displacement of Circle as infrastructure provider is a non-trivial possibility.
6. Regulatory Landscape
The global regulatory environment for cryptocurrency is tightening decisively. Three developments merit particular attention:
1.MiCA Implementation: The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation establishes comprehensive stablecoin issuer requirements. Binance failed to obtain MiCA authorisation. Effective 1 July 2026, European compliant exchanges removed USDT entirely.
2.US Treasury Oversight: Proposed legislation would mandate 1:1 reserve backing, periodic auditing by certified public accountants, and restrictions on reserve asset composition for stablecoin issuers operating in US markets.
3.Asian Regulatory Divergence: Hong Kong and Singapore pursue calibrated frameworks licensing select stablecoin arrangements, while maintaining strict separation from unbacked or algorithmic variants.
The trajectory is unambiguous: compliant stablecoin infrastructure will consolidate around regulated issuers, while unregulated alternatives retreat to offshore and grey-market jurisdictions.
7. The Future: Native Digital Dollars
The deposit-$1-receive-1-token model is fundamentally a transitional arrangement. The ultimate form of digital dollars is chain-native fiat — whether termed tokenised deposits, central bank digital currency (CBDC), or programmable money.
Native digital dollars will achieve maturity when two conditions converge:
1.Interoperability: Chain-issued dollars flow seamlessly across banks, borders, and platforms without intermediary conversion friction.
2.Regulatory Permission: Chain-native dollars gain explicit authorisation for DeFi participation, smart contract execution, and automated payment orchestration.
Upon realisation of these conditions, traditional stablecoins become redundant. Circle either transforms into a conventional bank or ceases to exist as a distinct entity. In the interim period between native dollar emergence and bank adoption, Circle and USDC function analogously to Alipay — a buffer zone between traditional banking and decentralised finance.
The future digital dollar is not a chain-side representation of fiat currency. It is currency natively born on blockchain — freely circulating, programmable, and capable of instantaneous settlement. It constitutes a SWIFT network accessible directly by small and medium enterprises and individual participants, not merely correspondent banks.
8. Investment Implications
Circle’s stock price dynamics reflect a three-horizon narrative:
- Short-Term (0-6 months): The 17% decline likely overstates fundamental damage. Market sentiment should normalise as OUSD’s execution challenges become apparent. Expect volatility around quarterly earnings and regulatory announcements.
- Medium-Term (6-24 months): USDT’s systematic withdrawal from regulated markets creates a substantial addressable market expansion for USDC. If Circle captures even a modest portion of former USDT activity in compliant jurisdictions, revenue growth should accelerate. We anticipate USDC achieving #1 stablecoin ranking by market capitalisation within 12-18 months.
- Long-Term (3-5 years): Native digital dollar infrastructure — tokenised deposits, CBDC, and bank-issued chain currency — will erode the foundational premise of independent stablecoin issuers. Circle’s terminal value depends on successful transition to banking infrastructure provider or acquisition by a financial institution seeking digital asset capabilities.
9. Conclusion
The stablecoin is one of the decade’s most consequential financial innovations — not for its technology, but for exposing the profound inefficiency of existing payment infrastructure. Circle’s 17% stock collapse reflects real concern: compliance moats can be challenged by institutional coalitions, and network effects are shallower than they appear.
Yet the trajectory is more nuanced. Short-term volatility should normalise as OUSD’s execution hurdles materialise. Medium-term, USDT’s regulatory retreat creates a windfall for USDC. Long-term, native digital dollars will render traditional stablecoins obsolete — but that horizon remains distant, giving Circle meaningful runway.
The war over stablecoins is, at its core, a war over who writes the rules for tomorrow’s financial infrastructure. The direction of travel is unmistakable: money is becoming programmable, settlement instantaneous, and access universal. The imperative is to understand this transition, and position to capture value as global finance restructures.
10. Reference
1.Circle Internet Financial. Annual Report FY2025. US Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K Filing, 2026.
2.CryptoNews. Tether Revenue Analysis 2025: $10 Billion from Reserve Yield. CryptoNews Research Desk, January 2026.
3.Open Standard Alliance. Open USD (OUSD) Launch Announcement. Press Release, 30 June 2026.
4.Chosun Ilbo. Asian OS Alliance Participants Clarify Non-Binding Involvement. Chosun Ilbo Business Desk, 3 July 2026.
5.SWIFT. Tokenised Deposit Initiative: Enabling 24/7 Cross-Border Settlement. SWIFT Strategic Innovation Paper, 2026.
6.European Union. Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, Official Journal of the European Union, 2023.
And more.
DISCLAIMER
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Opinions and estimates offered constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice, as are statements of financial market trends, which are based on current market conditions. We believe the information provided here is reliable, but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any cryptocurrencies. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice. Any forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be relied upon as advice or interpreted as a recommendation.
©Linux Group, October 2024.
Unless otherwise stated, all data is as of October 7, 2024 or as of most recently available.
